Tag: Partnership Act 1961

  • Definition of Partnership for Tax Purposes

    Definition of Partnership for Tax Purposes

    Definition of a Partnership

    According to section 2 of the Income Tax Act of 1967 (ITA 1967), the legal definition of a partnership is “any association of any kind between parties who have agreed to combine any of their rights, powers, property, labour, or skill for the purpose of carrying on a business and sharing the profits therefrom.”

    Exclusion

    The definition does not include a Hindu joint family, even though members of such a family may be partners in a partnership.

    Additionally, the definition does not include any association that was established pursuant to a scheme of financing in accordance with the principles of syariah.

    It is not sufficient to establish a partnership just by holding joint ownership of a piece of property, such as a house or a plantation.

    A person is not considered a partner in a business if the widow of a deceased partner receives a share of the business’s profits as an annuity from the business.

    ‘Individuals” and “Persons’

    A partnership need not be confined to individuals.

    A partnership can be defined as a business relationship that exists between two companies or between a company and an individual.

    Therefore, the term “partnership” refers to a connection between 2 or more individuals or persons in which they have made a pact to split the profits of a business that either all of them are running together or any one of them is running on their behalf.

    The Special Commissioners ruled in the case SK v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri (1996) MSTC 2670 that a certificate of registration is prima facie and substantial evidence of the existence of a partnership. 

    Who is Responsible for paying Income Tax

    When determining who is responsible for paying income tax, it is essential to distinguish between “individuals” and “persons.”

    The latter term has a broader meaning because, in addition to persons, it also covers other legal entities such as companies and Hindu joint families. However, partnerships are not included in its definition.

    It was also confirmed in Rose v FC of T (1951) 84 CLR 118 that a partnership is not a Chargeable Person per se because it is not a separate legal entity like a company.

    As a consequence of this fact, the partners of the partnership will be considered Chargeable Persons and will be subject to taxation on the partnership’s profits.

    Partnership Act

    The Partnership Act 1961 was enacted in Malaysia to regulate partnerships, and the provisions contain rules that must be followed.

    Public Ruling

    In 2021, the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) published Public Ruling No. 7/2021 on “Partnerships Taxation Part I – Determination of the Existence of a Partnership” to guide on determining whether or not a partnership exists for the income tax.

    According to the Partnership Act of 1961 and the Income Tax Act of 1967, the Public Ruling provided a list of the features of a partnership and the elements that should be examined when deciding whether or not a partnership exists. 

    Paragraph 6.3 of the Public Ruling outlines the distinctions between a co-ownership and a partnership.

    The Public Ruling No. 7/2021 should be read in conjunction with the Public Ruling No. 8/2021 entitled “Partnerships Taxation Part II – Computation and Allocation of Income.”

    合伙企业的定义

    根据《1967年所得税法令》(ITA 1967)第2条,合伙企业的法律定义是 – “同意将其任何权利、权力、财产、劳动或技能结合起来以开展业务并分享其中的利润的各方之间的任何形式的团体。”

    不适用

    该定义不包括印度教联合家庭,即使这种家庭的成员可能是合伙企业的合伙人。

    此外,该定义也不包括根据回教原则的融资计划所建立的任何团体。

    如果只是仅仅持有一项财产(如:房屋或园丘)的共同所有权,这也并不足以构成合伙企业的形成。

    还有,已故合伙人的遗孀以年金的形式获得企业利润的一部分,也不被视为企业的合伙人。

    ”个人 “和 “人士“

    合伙企业的拥有者,并不只局限于个人。

    合伙企业也可以被定义为存在于两个公司之间或一个公司与一个人之间的商业关系。

    因此,术语 “合伙 “是指2个或更多的个人或人士之间的联系,在这种联系中,他们达成协议,分享他们所有人共同经营的业务的利润,或分享其中任何一个人代表他们经营的业务的利润。

    税收局特别专员在 SK 诉 Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri(1996)MSTC 2670 一案中裁定,注册证书是合伙企业存在的表面证据和实质性证据。 

    谁负责支付所得税

    在确定谁有责任支付所得税时,必须区分 “个人 “和 “人士”。

    后者(即:“人士”)具有更广泛的含义,因为除了个人之外,它还包括其他法律实体,如公司和印度教联合家庭。然而,合伙企业并不包括在此定义中。

    而在 Rose v FC of T (1951) 84 CLR 118 一案中也证实了合伙企业本身不属于课税人士 [Chargeable Person],因为它不像公司那样是一个独立的法律实体。

    有鉴于此,合伙企业的股东也就成了课税人士 [Chargeable Person],需要为合伙企业的净利纳税。

    合伙企业法

    马来西亚制定了《1961年合伙企业法令》来规范合伙企业,其条款包含了所必须遵守的规则。

    公共裁决

    2021年,内陆税收局(IRB)发布了《第 7/2021 号公共裁决》,内容为 “合伙企业税收第一部分 –确定合伙企业的存在”,以指导确定合伙企业是否存在时所得税的问题。

    根据《1961年合伙企业法令》和《1967年的所得税法令》,该公共裁决提供了一份合伙企业的特征清单,以及在决定合伙企业是否存在时应审查的要素。 

    《公共裁决》第6.3段也概述了共同所有权 [Co-ownership] 和合伙企业 [Partnership] 之间的区别。

    第 7/2021 号公共裁决应与题为 “合伙企业税收第二部分 — 收入的计算和分配” 的第 8/2021 号公共裁决一起阅读。

    25
  • Partnerships In Malaysia – Theory

    Partnerships In Malaysia – Theory

    Agreement

    An agreement between two (2) persons but not exceed twenty (20) persons to carry on a business in order to make a profit.

    协议

    两(2)人但不超过二十(20)人之间的协议,以开展业务,赚取利润为目的。

    Unique features

    • Quick and painless registration procedures
    • The business made no tax payments.
    • Less formal business obligations
    • Simple procedure for winding up
    • The cost of compliance is lower each year

    特征

    • 注册步骤快速和方便
    • 企业本身不需要自行缴税
    • 正式的商业义务较少
    • 清盘程序简单
    • 每年的合规成本低

    Advantages

    • Can raise more capital
    • More skills & knowledge
    • Share the work amongst partners

    优点

    • 可以筹集更多的资金
    • 更多的技能和知识
    • 合伙人之间可以相互分担职责

    Disadvantages

    • Profits must now be shared
    • A partnership is not a Separate Legal Entity, so partners have the risk of being sued
    • Disagreements can occur, they are not permitted to kick anyone out of the business unless the authority to do so was established in a legally binding document at the time the business was established [Partnership Agreement]
    • Partners are unable to act on their own.
    • Each partner is responsible for disclosing, within their own individual tax return, the amount of profit they personally received from the business.

    缺点

    • 需要与合伙人分享利润
    • 合伙企业不是一个独立的法律实体,因此合伙人会有着被告的风险
    • 分歧可能发生,他们不允许将任何人踢出合伙企业,除非在合伙企业成立时,在具有法律约束力的文件中规定了这样做的权力 [即:合伙协议,英文 – Partnership Agreement]
    • 合伙人本身不能独立行事
    • 每个合伙人都有责任在自己的个人所得税报表内披露他们个人从合伙企业获得的利润数额

    In the absence of a Partnership Agreement

    According to the Partnership Act 1961, in the absence of a partnership agreement:

    • All partners contribute equal capital
    • Profits or losses will be shared equally
    • Partners are not entitled salaries
    • Partners are not entitled, before the ascertainment of profits, to interest on the capital subscribed by him
    • No change may be made in the nature of the partnership business without the consent of all existing partners
    • No majority of the partners can expel any partner
    • Partners are entitled to 8% interest on a loan they make to the partnership

    在没有合伙协议的情况下

    根据《1961年合伙法令》,在没有合伙协议的情况下:

    • 所有合伙人贡献同等的资本
    • 利润或亏损将被平分
    • 合伙人无权获得薪金
    • 在确定利润之前,合伙人无权获得他所认购的资本的利息
    • 未经所有现有合伙人的同意,不得改变合伙业务的性质
    • 绝大多数的合伙人不能开除任何其他合伙人
    • 合伙人有权就其向合伙企业提供的贷款收取8%的利息

    30